Free Press Suicide Watch
Essentially because the FCC Net Neutrality proposal is surprisingly fair and seems to stem from compromise from both sides of the debate Free Press has decided the FCC is adopting ‘fake Net Neutrality”. The campaign has begun with the following video:
Along with a “rally the troops” letter writing campaign (which hopefully for them will get more support than the 20 people that showed up for their Google rally) Tim Karr and Josh Silver have written their nonsensical remarks here and here.
I’m not sure what definition these guys go by for the word “compromise” but in any case they apparently don’t like it. It appears that for most of the net the proposal seems, at a minimum, fair. It’s not exactly what anyone wanted. Generally when policy is not exactly what anyone wanted then that means compromise took place, and it is most likely fair to all parties.
So when a group demonizes “fair” generally it is because they operate from a “my way or the highway” mentality. Which leads me to believe that nothing short of an entire government takeover of the Internet would have made the folks at SaveTheInternet and Free Press happy. Either that, or they are concerned that now that the issue may be settled their organization will no longer be relevant.
[/shrug]
And for that reason, I am officially placing Josh Silver, Tim Karr, and Free Press on suicide watch.

[...] don’t lose hope entirely. Now is the time to fight, not to give up. Drink the sweet, nourishing tears of the radicals and stay loud, stay active, stay aggressive in informing people about the dangers of radical action [...]
[...] Originally published at DigitalSociety. [...]
Leave your response!
Twitter Feed
About Us
Digital Society is a digital think tank that believes culture and commerce are inseparable, that the digital economy flourishes when people are free and rights are secure, and that free markets free people.
Digital Society is an independent 501(c)3 non-profit organization, funded by donations from Jon Henke and from Arts+Labs. We advocate for a pro-culture, pro-commerce digital society through research, analysis and debate on emerging technology issues.
Reply Comments
Transparency and interactivity are trademarks of the Internet era, and we aim to foster them here at Digital Society. It is inevitable that some people will disagree with the technology policy positions we take. We want to have that constructive debate.
The Reply Comments feature gives our critics a chance to respond to our viewpoints and the Digital Society audience convenient access to competing arguments. Any time we directly challenge the views of an individual or a group on this site, the party in question may substantively respond in a guest post.
Please contact executive director Jon Henke by e-mail.
Subscribe
Recent Posts