<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online services security report card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=online-services-security-report-card</link>
	<description>Pro-Culture, Pro-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Services Security Report Card &#124; The Barracuda Labs Internet Security Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-3/#comment-22244</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Services Security Report Card &#124; The Barracuda Labs Internet Security Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 02:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-22244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up the last post on Firesheep, George Ou over at digitalsociety.org put together an excellent report card for some of the most popular online service websites and some explanations about some of the attack [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up the last post on Firesheep, George Ou over at digitalsociety.org put together an excellent report card for some of the most popular online service websites and some explanations about some of the attack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 99% of Google Android Devices Vulnerable &#124; SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-3/#comment-21643</link>
		<dc:creator>99% of Google Android Devices Vulnerable &#124; SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 19:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-21643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 99% of Google Android Devices Vulnerable &#124; High Tech Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-3/#comment-21641</link>
		<dc:creator>99% of Google Android Devices Vulnerable &#124; High Tech Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 11:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-21641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security Risks in Social Media &#171; Status Not Quo</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-3/#comment-21148</link>
		<dc:creator>Security Risks in Social Media &#171; Status Not Quo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-21148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook and Twitter Flunk Security Report Card - A Geek to Go! &#187; A Geek to Go!</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-3/#comment-20965</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook and Twitter Flunk Security Report Card - A Geek to Go! &#187; A Geek to Go!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-20965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Society, a self-professed security think tank, has given failing security grades to both Twitter and Facebook. Both sites are vulnerable to attacks that can give someone partial or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Society, a self-professed security think tank, has given failing security grades to both Twitter and Facebook. Both sites are vulnerable to attacks that can give someone partial or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashton Kutcher Meets Firesheep, Twitter Hacked &#124; SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-3/#comment-20869</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashton Kutcher Meets Firesheep, Twitter Hacked &#124; SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-20869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ashton Kutcher meets Firesheep, twitter hacked</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-2/#comment-20840</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ashton Kutcher meets Firesheep, twitter hacked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-20840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Someone in DC cares about online security</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-2/#comment-20750</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Someone in DC cares about online security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-20750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gmail&#8217;s new two-factor authentication improves security</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-2/#comment-20408</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Gmail&#8217;s new two-factor authentication improves security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-20408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] some background, Gmail did very well in my online security report card, but that likely had something to do with the fact that Google got most of the negative attention [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some background, Gmail did very well in my online security report card, but that likely had something to do with the fact that Google got most of the negative attention [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve caturan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/11/online-services-security-report-card/comment-page-2/#comment-20348</link>
		<dc:creator>steve caturan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 05:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7595#comment-20348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey George,

I&#039;m assuming you&#039;re already familiar with https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/ ? great tool, btw.

best regards,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey George,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming you&#8217;re already familiar with <a href="https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/" rel="nofollow">https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/</a> ? great tool, btw.</p>
<p>best regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
