<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming to a Supreme Court Near You &#8211; Inducing Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/10/coming-to-a-supreme-court-near-you-inducing-infringement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/10/coming-to-a-supreme-court-near-you-inducing-infringement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=coming-to-a-supreme-court-near-you-inducing-infringement</link>
	<description>Pro-Culture, Pro-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/10/coming-to-a-supreme-court-near-you-inducing-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-16699</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=7227#comment-16699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish I knew more about the legal concept of &quot;inducement&quot;.  I am only aware of its application as means of introducing liability where none exists according to law... and I think that is probably a less than enlightened perspective.

That being said, &quot;induced infringement&quot; always sounded to me as being too similar to the same idea as holding gun companies liable for armed robbery or murder...  A dangerous idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I knew more about the legal concept of &#8220;inducement&#8221;.  I am only aware of its application as means of introducing liability where none exists according to law&#8230; and I think that is probably a less than enlightened perspective.</p>
<p>That being said, &#8220;induced infringement&#8221; always sounded to me as being too similar to the same idea as holding gun companies liable for armed robbery or murder&#8230;  A dangerous idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
