Home » Internet

Firehose #4

By James DeLong 5 May 2010 No Comment

Think Tank World

  • New website: “Think Tanked is a blog specializing in original reporting and analysis on the influence of think tanks in the politics of Washington and beyond.” Ah, we love to be told how important we are, and we love even more for everyone else to be told.
  • Heartland Institute, via Jeff Judson, provides  21 Reasons Why Free‐Market Think Tanks Are More Effective than Anyone Else in Changing Public Policy (and one reason why they are not)(April 12): More of the kind of thinking we like, except when he explains why tanks actually don’t much change the world: “Think tanks are chronically underfunded . . .  The funds they need are almost trivial when compared with the billions spent on political campaigns, lobbying, advertising, litigation, government relations, and other public relations activities. While liberal advocacy groups often have enormous budgets, barely a dozen free‐market think tanks have budgets of more than $5 million.”

Content & Copyright

Software

  • eWeek, Microsoft’s HTC Android Agreement May Be the First of Many (April 29): “The move could indicate that Microsoft plans to port its philosophical position on open source into the smartphone operating-system realm.”
  • NewTeeVee,  Apple May Be Gunning for Open Source Codecs (April 30):  Important news for those in the FOSS vs Open Standards vs Pure Proprietary wars. Steve Jobs makes the crucial point that an Open Standard is by no means an Open Source Standard – a distinction the FOSS crowd keeps trying to blur.  See also ZDNet, Microsoft fires back at critics of its HTML5 strategy (May 3): “Apple and Microsoft . . . find themselves on the same side (more or less) of a tremendously contentious issue: Which video format will be adopted as the standard for the Internet over the next five (or more) years?”

The Net

Connected Planet, Careful what you wish for Google: Here comes ’search neutrality (April 30):  “In the ‘what goes around comes around’ category, the idea of ‘search neutrality’ — or the need for government intervention or regulation to ensure that search results from the likes of Google and other search engines aren’t discriminatory — is starting to gain some traction.”

ars technica, Search neutrality? How Google became a “neutrality” target (April 30): “[N]et neutrality is just the latest attempt to answer some ancient questions concerning fairness, monopolies, and infrastructure. In 2008, University of Colorado law prof Phil Weiser (now in the Obama Department of Justice) wrote a paper of his own that offered this pithy summary of the basic issue.

See also: The American, Avoiding a Tech Train Wreck (May/June 2008)(by moi): “These battles may seem novel, a result of the frictions of the technological revolution worked by Moore’s Law and its progeny. In fact, while the context is new, the underlying structure of the disputes is similar to the issues that roiled American politics a century and more ago, when the great infrastructures of transportation, utilities, telecommunications, and finance were laid down.“

Digital Commerce & Cybersecurity

Open Government

  • Last week saw the launch of World Bank Data, which for the first time makes World Bank data freely available to the public.
  • For sale: Charts of the governments of the PRC and of the Provincial Governments, including pictures and contact information. 500 RMN for the package. (Of course, they are in Chinese.) Am I right to think this is a major step in accountability?

Health, Medical Innovation, Genetics, Agriculture

  • International Policy Network., Fake Drugs Roundup (April 1)
  • The American, Something Old, Something New: Biotech’s Enormous Potential (April 30), by John Calfee: “Medical breakthroughs from using existing drugs in new ways await discovery—if manufacturers have an incentive to pursue them.”
  • FiercePharma, E&Y: Biotech business model crumbles as crisis hit (May 5): “The accounting firm concludes that the biotech business model is ‘unsustainable’ in a crisis like this. . . . Altogether 162 publicly traded biotech companies–a whopping 44 percent of the total–have less than a year’s worth of operating capital in the bank at the end of last year.”
  • Boingboing, Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (now on your junk) (April 29): “Speaking of Superbugs, it looks like we’re on our way to incurable, antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea. This article also brings up a point I didn’t mention in the book review yesterday: Part of the problem is that nobody is developing new antibiotics. Once an old drug becomes ineffective, there’s nothing to replace it with. New drugs could be made, but the work (as with any brand new drug development) is expensive, and pharmaceutical companies aren’t inclined to invest in products with a limited effective life, that patients only use for short periods of time.”
  • FiercePharma, Generics association scrambles to win back Teva (April 26):  The “generics behemoth–with 16.3 percent of all U.S. prescriptions, branded and generic” is leaving GPhA and launching its own lobbying efforts. There must be a good story here. Last year, Roche pulled out of Phrma and joined BIO, so a lot of reshuffling is going on in the industry.
  • FiercePharma, The pharma trifecta: Generics, new markets, and personalization (April 27): The big three issues for Pharma, says a Harvard Business Review blog post. One good point relates to the counterfeiting problem: Perhaps the most promising approach is drug companies getting into “branded generics” themselves. These branded versions of their original drugs sell for higher prices than unbranded generic equivalents but are less expensive than the true branded product. Why would consumers pay more for a branded generic than a cheaper version? We need only look at the consumer packaged goods industry to understand the power of branding — be it a bar of Dove soap or an Apple computer. Moreover, in emerging markets where fake products are common, branded generics provide a level of assurance that makes them worth the premium they charge.

Innovation Miscellany

China

  • Sacramento Bee, The Frame, Shanghai World Expo set to open (April 26): Lots of great pix, at least for those who prefer the gaudy and spectacular over the subtle and nuanced.
  • SIPO of the PRC, ASEAN-China Intellectual Property Cooperation Conference Held in Beijing (April 13):  “WIPO Director-General Francis Gurry expressed that in the 21st century world economic power and growth momentum lies in Southeast Asia. The meeting was of great significance for China and ASEAN member countries to share experience in intellectual property field and promote economic development through innovation. Francis Gurry stressed that although China’s patent system only had a history of as short as 25 years, China’s achievements in intellectual property was remarkable. China’s PCT international patent applications had ranked fifth in the world. SIPO had become the world’s third largest patent office. All these successful experiences could provide invaluable insights for ASEAN member countries for their development of intellectual property right.”
  • SIPO of the PRC, From Jan – Mar 2010, China granted 188,919 patents.
  • China Daily, Websites in China mushroomed to over 3 million (May 4): And growing at an annual rate of 12.3%.
  • See above, under “Open Government.”

Events

*  *  *  *  *

[The explanation of the title Firehose is here.]

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.