<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: App Rising on the Net Neutrality Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/02/app-rising-on-the-net-neutrality-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/02/app-rising-on-the-net-neutrality-debate/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=app-rising-on-the-net-neutrality-debate</link>
	<description>Pro-Culture, Pro-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ou</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2010/02/app-rising-on-the-net-neutrality-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=2303#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>I wish all Net Neutrality proponents were reasonable like this.  So long as the definition of Net Neutrality doesn&#039;t mandate a &quot;dumb pipe&quot; or &quot;First In First Out&quot; network and so long as it doesn&#039;t outlaw business models and other existing contractual agreements, then consider me pro Net Neutrality.

The problem is that the Neutrality proponents want the dumb network and they want to ban current and future potential business models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish all Net Neutrality proponents were reasonable like this.  So long as the definition of Net Neutrality doesn&#8217;t mandate a &#8220;dumb pipe&#8221; or &#8220;First In First Out&#8221; network and so long as it doesn&#8217;t outlaw business models and other existing contractual agreements, then consider me pro Net Neutrality.</p>
<p>The problem is that the Neutrality proponents want the dumb network and they want to ban current and future potential business models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

