<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Israeli ISPs falsely accused of blocking BitTorrent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent</link>
	<description>Pro-Culture, Pro-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: idahoagbell.org</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>idahoagbell.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1724#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Society » Blog Archive » Israeli ISPs falsely accused of &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Society » Blog Archive » Israeli ISPs falsely accused of &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: farnsworthonbroadway.net</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2310</link>
		<dc:creator>farnsworthonbroadway.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1724#comment-2310</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Society » Blog Archive » Israeli ISPs falsely accused of &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Society » Blog Archive » Israeli ISPs falsely accused of &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Restitutional Justice in Copyright, or why should Copyright Holders seek justice from the ISPs.</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2286</link>
		<dc:creator>Restitutional Justice in Copyright, or why should Copyright Holders seek justice from the ISPs.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1724#comment-2286</guid>
		<description>[...] we conducted with Ynet News in regards to p2p throttling and DPI in Israel, which was (even after reading the criticism) most likely the most comprehensive in Israel, even though it needed more research. One of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we conducted with Ynet News in regards to p2p throttling and DPI in Israel, which was (even after reading the criticism) most likely the most comprehensive in Israel, even though it needed more research. One of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ou</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1724#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>Jonathan,

What you found was inconclusive and weak.  You found no examples of blocking, yet the stories are claiming that blocking is going on.  Protocol identification hardly justifies being called DPI, and DPI is not illegal or necessarily a bad thing.

Are anti-spam, anti-virus, and Intrusion Detection Systems also illegal in your country?  We have people in this country that claim these things are illegal too arguing that it breaks wire tap rules and that you need two-sided consent.  But would a spammer and malware pusher ever give you permission to inspect their traffic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan,</p>
<p>What you found was inconclusive and weak.  You found no examples of blocking, yet the stories are claiming that blocking is going on.  Protocol identification hardly justifies being called DPI, and DPI is not illegal or necessarily a bad thing.</p>
<p>Are anti-spam, anti-virus, and Intrusion Detection Systems also illegal in your country?  We have people in this country that claim these things are illegal too arguing that it breaks wire tap rules and that you need two-sided consent.  But would a spammer and malware pusher ever give you permission to inspect their traffic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/israeli-isps-falsely-accused-of-blocking-bittorrent/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1724#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>I suggest you re-read the report. We found both evidence of listening to bittorrent traffic and intercepting it (which, at least in Israel, is illegal) and throttling of ports or protocols, which are considered DPI (when it&#039;s protocols).

The DPI found in caching is different from the one found in differing, where it limited any traffic based on protocols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you re-read the report. We found both evidence of listening to bittorrent traffic and intercepting it (which, at least in Israel, is illegal) and throttling of ports or protocols, which are considered DPI (when it&#8217;s protocols).</p>
<p>The DPI found in caching is different from the one found in differing, where it limited any traffic based on protocols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

