<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A meaningful debate on NPRM regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations</link>
	<description>Pro-Culture, Pro-Commerce</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Net Neutrality economic study based on flawed analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2981</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Net Neutrality economic study based on flawed analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2981</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An accurate debate on Internet regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An accurate debate on Internet regulation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free speech doesn&#8217;t mean free as in free beer</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Society &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free speech doesn&#8217;t mean free as in free beer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>[...] banned services and the type of &#8220;providers&#8221; that fall under this blanket prohibition is deliberately and vague and open ended and it can stifle innovation if Paid Peering is outlawed, but the more fundamental problem lies in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] banned services and the type of &#8220;providers&#8221; that fall under this blanket prohibition is deliberately and vague and open ended and it can stifle innovation if Paid Peering is outlawed, but the more fundamental problem lies in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henke</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>As stated in our About page, we get some of our funding from Arts+Labs (http://artsandlabs.com/), which contains a number of organizations including telecoms.  However, we have a very clear agreement that the companies may not interfere with, or dictate, our activities or positions.  We are completely free to take, or decline to take, any position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated in our About page, we get some of our funding from Arts+Labs (<a href="http://artsandlabs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://artsandlabs.com/</a>), which contains a number of organizations including telecoms.  However, we have a very clear agreement that the companies may not interfere with, or dictate, our activities or positions.  We are completely free to take, or decline to take, any position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ou</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>Mike,

We are very open about our funding and it&#039;s been disclosed here for some time http://www.digitalsociety.org/about/ if you simply clicked on the about page.

It seems as though you are more interested in stifling debate on this subject than discussing the matter at hand and taking some kind of meaningful stance on the important questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>We are very open about our funding and it&#8217;s been disclosed here for some time <a href="http://www.digitalsociety.org/about/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalsociety.org/about/</a> if you simply clicked on the about page.</p>
<p>It seems as though you are more interested in stifling debate on this subject than discussing the matter at hand and taking some kind of meaningful stance on the important questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike H.</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>In the interest of laying all cards out on the table before we debate this &quot;openly&quot;, is digitalsociety funded by any telecom and/or cable operators?  If so, which ones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of laying all cards out on the table before we debate this &#8220;openly&#8221;, is digitalsociety funded by any telecom and/or cable operators?  If so, which ones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which business models will the FCC ban on the Internet? &#124; Technology for Mortals</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/12/a-meaningful-debate-on-nprm-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Which business models will the FCC ban on the Internet? &#124; Technology for Mortals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=1636#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

