Piling on the Berkman study
We’ve had our turn knocking down the Berkman broadband study and even responded to Yochai Benkler’s response, but Mark Goldberg has done a great job of summarizing the latest brutal critiques. Here’s an interesting sample of Mark Goldberg’s post:
- NTT weighed in and said that the Berkman study was “factually incorrect and internally inconsistent”, and that it would have been much better if Yochai Benkler or his team had actually interviewed NTT for some facts about NTT and the Japanese broadband market.
- Goldberg also pointed out that the Berkman center ignored its FCC mandate to “conduct an independent expert review of existing literature and studies about broadband deployment and usage throughout the world”.
There’s much more interesting stuff and you should read it at CircleID.
[...] [...]
[...] [...]
Leave your response!
Twitter Feed
About Us
Digital Society is a digital think tank that believes culture and commerce are inseparable, that the digital economy flourishes when people are free and rights are secure, and that free markets free people.
Digital Society is an independent 501(c)3 non-profit organization, funded by donations from Jon Henke and from Arts+Labs. We advocate for a pro-culture, pro-commerce digital society through research, analysis and debate on emerging technology issues.
Reply Comments
Transparency and interactivity are trademarks of the Internet era, and we aim to foster them here at Digital Society. It is inevitable that some people will disagree with the technology policy positions we take. We want to have that constructive debate.
The Reply Comments feature gives our critics a chance to respond to our viewpoints and the Digital Society audience convenient access to competing arguments. Any time we directly challenge the views of an individual or a group on this site, the party in question may substantively respond in a guest post.
Please contact executive director Jon Henke by e-mail.
Subscribe
Recent Posts