Comments on: New FCC Net Neutrality rules based on flawed report http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/10/new-fcc-net-neutrality-rules-based-on-flawed-report/ Pro-Culture, Pro-Commerce Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:38:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: George Ou http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/10/new-fcc-net-neutrality-rules-based-on-flawed-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1282 George Ou Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:22:40 +0000 http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=944#comment-1282 No, you're confusing my personal blog with Digital Society. The Nook e-reader post never appeared on Digital Society. No, you’re confusing my personal blog with Digital Society. The Nook e-reader post never appeared on Digital Society.

]]> By: AllisonQ http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/10/new-fcc-net-neutrality-rules-based-on-flawed-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1278 AllisonQ Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:25:19 +0000 http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=944#comment-1278 Did you just disappear a post about the Nook e-reader? Did you just disappear a post about the Nook e-reader?

]]> By: George Ou http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/10/new-fcc-net-neutrality-rules-based-on-flawed-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1276 George Ou Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:57:37 +0000 http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=944#comment-1276 Thanks Dave, The content censorship issue is is a false issue designed to trick people into supporting Net Neutrality regulation. The actual regulation involves a lot of things that have nothing to do with stopping content censorship since censorship was never an issue to begin with. If you want to read what Net Neutrality regulation actually does, this article will explain it all. http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/09/hr3458-a-dangerous-experiment-in-internet-regulation/ Thanks Dave,

The content censorship issue is is a false issue designed to trick people into supporting Net Neutrality regulation.

The actual regulation involves a lot of things that have nothing to do with stopping content censorship since censorship was never an issue to begin with. If you want to read what Net Neutrality regulation actually does, this article will explain it all.
http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/09/hr3458-a-dangerous-experiment-in-internet-regulation/

]]> By: David Emme http://www.digitalsociety.org/2009/10/new-fcc-net-neutrality-rules-based-on-flawed-report/comment-page-1/#comment-1271 David Emme Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:01:27 +0000 http://www.digitalsociety.org/?p=944#comment-1271 Recently heard about this on the Glen Beck show and in my research-have not seen much about content cntrolled. From what I can percieve(if you can respond back to this to let me know if I am on the right track.) Network Neutrality is designed to stop companies(like mine-Blue Ridge Cable) to stop offering tiered services. For instance, I pay for their highest service to have the highest download/upload speeds. As Isee it, this will stop competition and innovation where all will have the same level of service and slow internet traffic to crawl since not everyone can always afford the priemiere services. I keep hearing of controlling content and am sure it probably does happen from time to time so to make it "fair" for all we will all have the same slow service(why many went from dial up to Broadband) When i keep seeing them showing the comments of President Obama while campaigning ensuring everyone has broad band is the same as anything that the government wants to get involved with where everyone might have broadband, but also this leaves no incentives for our providers to give quality efforts to improve the product and we are basically back to a little bit better then dial up yet not as good as we have it now. In other words, this is another way to regulate commerce and make it worst, especially sance many found an income stream of selling and buying on the internet(which I do often) and will also cause many to start losing money and eventually some great companies foregoing internet business. As I see it as a further control, devolution, and destruction of good ole fasioned capitalism which has worked very well in the unregulated digital world. Please, if I am wrong and getting my facts and perceptions wrong, please correct me on this. Thanks God bless Dave Emme Recently heard about this on the Glen Beck show and in my research-have not seen much about content cntrolled. From what I can percieve(if you can respond back to this to let me know if I am on the right track.)

Network Neutrality is designed to stop companies(like mine-Blue Ridge Cable) to stop offering tiered services. For instance, I pay for their highest service to have the highest download/upload speeds.

As Isee it, this will stop competition and innovation where all will have the same level of service and slow internet traffic to crawl since not everyone can always afford the priemiere services.

I keep hearing of controlling content and am sure it probably does happen from time to time so to make it “fair” for all we will all have the same slow service(why many went from dial up to Broadband)

When i keep seeing them showing the comments of President Obama while campaigning ensuring everyone has broad band is the same as anything that the government wants to get involved with where everyone might have broadband, but also this leaves no incentives for our providers to give quality efforts to improve the product and we are basically back to a little bit better then dial up yet not as good as we have it now.

In other words, this is another way to regulate commerce and make it worst, especially sance many found an income stream of selling and buying on the internet(which I do often) and will also cause many to start losing money and eventually some great companies foregoing internet business.

As I see it as a further control, devolution, and destruction of good ole fasioned capitalism which has worked very well in the unregulated digital world.

Please, if I am wrong and getting my facts and perceptions wrong, please correct me on this.

Thanks
God bless
Dave Emme

]]>